"๐๐๐๐ค ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ซ ๐จ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ง๐,....
โฆthough oftentimes better than master of one. Yes, that is the full and original quote.
Originally meant as a compliment for those with broad knowledge, the phrase has evolved into a critique, implying a lack of depth in any single area.
I see this shift in perception being mirrored in how some businesses prioritize hiring. Many now favour specialists with deep expertise in a single field, sometimes overlooking the value of those with diverse, transferable skills.
I recall being asked by a former colleague, who had worked for me some years earlier โHow did you move from product management into supply chain?โ
While my answer at the time was less eloquent, it comes down to one thing: ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐๐๐ซ๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ
When you work in any field for a significant period, you donโt just gain expertise in a specific areaโyou also develop critical skills like leadership, negotiation, and strategic thinking. These are the skills that transcend industries and functions.
Organizations, particularly startups or those undergoing significant change, need more than just โmasters of one.โ They need individuals who understand the challenges across departmentsโwhether itโs product, supply chain, or salesโand can help operationalize the business to minimize friction and drive results.
To be clear, specialists are invaluable. Their deep knowledge drives innovation and excellence. But businesses thrive when complemented by those with cross-functional experienceโthe โJack of all tradesโ who can adapt to the evolving needs of the organization.
In my experience, itโs this balance that creates resilience and long-term success.
Whatโs your take? How does your organization value breadth versus depth of experience?